<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fat Acceptance Wants Censorship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unfatblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/fat-acceptance-wants-internet-censorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unfatblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/fat-acceptance-wants-internet-censorship/</link>
	<description>Candid Discussion of Obesity, Relationships, and Fat Acceptance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:51:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Heather Bartlett</title>
		<link>http://unfatblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/fat-acceptance-wants-internet-censorship/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Bartlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfatblog.wordpress.com/?p=29#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Also Chris - when people advocate losing weight and call you disrespectful and that you are gaining on purpose (the tagline for this blog&#039;s sister) then you ARE advocating for whatever it takes to lose the weight.  That makes losing the weight more important and the way a person looks more important than who they are.  Our mortal coils are not all that we are.  Even I have to revisit that thought sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also Chris &#8211; when people advocate losing weight and call you disrespectful and that you are gaining on purpose (the tagline for this blog&#8217;s sister) then you ARE advocating for whatever it takes to lose the weight.  That makes losing the weight more important and the way a person looks more important than who they are.  Our mortal coils are not all that we are.  Even I have to revisit that thought sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Bartlett</title>
		<link>http://unfatblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/fat-acceptance-wants-internet-censorship/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Bartlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfatblog.wordpress.com/?p=29#comment-213</guid>
		<description>I think the real issue - at least for me - is the constant focus on HOW WOMEN LOOK as opposed to what they are putting in their mouth.  Not as in HOW MUCH really, but the quality of food they are eating.  And the other thing is exercise.  Exercise is very important for good health.  The thing is you can eat good foods and get adequate exercise and still be considered fat and even obese.  

I do not advocate eschewing exercise because you think that means you are giving in to the mainstream idea of beauty or something.  Realize people can be fat and healthy.  A value of a human being is not in their size.  A person is not less valuable if they are fat.  It doesn&#039;t mean they are lazy either.  There are plenty of thin lazy people - I&#039;ve met some!

It&#039;s judging a book by its cover.  That&#039;s not fair.  

Some of the extremist FA stuff is as bad and wrong as the extremist &quot;you gotta lose weight you ugly cow&quot; side is.

Eat healthy food.  Get some exercise.  Accept your body and love it.  Just try to be the best version of you that you can be and not some supermodel.  That&#039;s all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the real issue &#8211; at least for me &#8211; is the constant focus on HOW WOMEN LOOK as opposed to what they are putting in their mouth.  Not as in HOW MUCH really, but the quality of food they are eating.  And the other thing is exercise.  Exercise is very important for good health.  The thing is you can eat good foods and get adequate exercise and still be considered fat and even obese.  </p>
<p>I do not advocate eschewing exercise because you think that means you are giving in to the mainstream idea of beauty or something.  Realize people can be fat and healthy.  A value of a human being is not in their size.  A person is not less valuable if they are fat.  It doesn&#8217;t mean they are lazy either.  There are plenty of thin lazy people &#8211; I&#8217;ve met some!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s judging a book by its cover.  That&#8217;s not fair.  </p>
<p>Some of the extremist FA stuff is as bad and wrong as the extremist &#8220;you gotta lose weight you ugly cow&#8221; side is.</p>
<p>Eat healthy food.  Get some exercise.  Accept your body and love it.  Just try to be the best version of you that you can be and not some supermodel.  That&#8217;s all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://unfatblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/fat-acceptance-wants-internet-censorship/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 19:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfatblog.wordpress.com/?p=29#comment-210</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think anyone here is advocating unhealthy weight loss methods.  I think a lot of people are just angry at the way weight loss has been depicted in the FA universe.  There are plenty of ways to lose weight and be healthy at the same time.  Starvation diets are bad and often make you look worse than when you started due to muscle loss, and they are less sustainable.  But resistance train 3x a week and eat a clean 500-1000 calories below maintenance and you&#039;ll lose weight AND be healthy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone here is advocating unhealthy weight loss methods.  I think a lot of people are just angry at the way weight loss has been depicted in the FA universe.  There are plenty of ways to lose weight and be healthy at the same time.  Starvation diets are bad and often make you look worse than when you started due to muscle loss, and they are less sustainable.  But resistance train 3x a week and eat a clean 500-1000 calories below maintenance and you&#8217;ll lose weight AND be healthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fat Bastard</title>
		<link>http://unfatblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/fat-acceptance-wants-internet-censorship/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat Bastard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfatblog.wordpress.com/?p=29#comment-209</guid>
		<description>I think if Kate Harding had a good feed session with ProudFA my blog&#039;s  co owner  she would be a bit less ornery.

I think she&#039;s hungry. We fat people can become very grouchy when we get rumblings in our tummies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if Kate Harding had a good feed session with ProudFA my blog&#8217;s  co owner  she would be a bit less ornery.</p>
<p>I think she&#8217;s hungry. We fat people can become very grouchy when we get rumblings in our tummies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fat Bastard</title>
		<link>http://unfatblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/fat-acceptance-wants-internet-censorship/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat Bastard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfatblog.wordpress.com/?p=29#comment-208</guid>
		<description>My site is one FA site that does not squash dissent. 

HTTP://BIGGERFATTERBLOG.BLOGSPOT.COM

We take on fat hatred without being hateful. Stop by and we can agree to disagree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My site is one FA site that does not squash dissent. </p>
<p>HTTP://BIGGERFATTERBLOG.BLOGSPOT.COM</p>
<p>We take on fat hatred without being hateful. Stop by and we can agree to disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Bartlett</title>
		<link>http://unfatblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/fat-acceptance-wants-internet-censorship/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Bartlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 18:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfatblog.wordpress.com/?p=29#comment-188</guid>
		<description>Thank you Mary.  However, I do think that the tagline for myfatspouse alone gives a strong implication of the general tone of the site.  

My impressions were based on the things I clicked on and read.  Perhaps if I&#039;d spent a bit more time I would have seen more of what you are referring to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Mary.  However, I do think that the tagline for myfatspouse alone gives a strong implication of the general tone of the site.  </p>
<p>My impressions were based on the things I clicked on and read.  Perhaps if I&#8217;d spent a bit more time I would have seen more of what you are referring to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary 45</title>
		<link>http://unfatblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/fat-acceptance-wants-internet-censorship/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary 45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfatblog.wordpress.com/?p=29#comment-187</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that Myfatspouse, contrary to the FA-blogs,  has any distinct ideology or agenda. It&#039;s an open and very lightly moderated forum and we, so to speak, get all sorts of people. The tone of the discussions vary and the arguments can get heated. Sometimes people say a bit shocking and extreme things and censorship is a last resort. If someone, for example, says that a certain size is acceptable  but  another size is not, it is only the opinion of this person and anyone would be welcome to argue against it.

One theme that keeps coming up is how people react when they first become aware of the existence of the FA-blogs.  It&#039;s usually amazement and disbelief, and a sense that the world has suddenly gone mad.  This is probably very much due to the fact that they deny all negative health effects of obesity, and don&#039;t allow any dissenting opinions.

As a result people go from not giving much thought to the fat/obese people they encounter in their daily lives to suddenly seeing FA-extremists everywhere, and feel a compelling need to preach about the dangers of the ideology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that Myfatspouse, contrary to the FA-blogs,  has any distinct ideology or agenda. It&#8217;s an open and very lightly moderated forum and we, so to speak, get all sorts of people. The tone of the discussions vary and the arguments can get heated. Sometimes people say a bit shocking and extreme things and censorship is a last resort. If someone, for example, says that a certain size is acceptable  but  another size is not, it is only the opinion of this person and anyone would be welcome to argue against it.</p>
<p>One theme that keeps coming up is how people react when they first become aware of the existence of the FA-blogs.  It&#8217;s usually amazement and disbelief, and a sense that the world has suddenly gone mad.  This is probably very much due to the fact that they deny all negative health effects of obesity, and don&#8217;t allow any dissenting opinions.</p>
<p>As a result people go from not giving much thought to the fat/obese people they encounter in their daily lives to suddenly seeing FA-extremists everywhere, and feel a compelling need to preach about the dangers of the ideology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Bartlett</title>
		<link>http://unfatblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/fat-acceptance-wants-internet-censorship/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Bartlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfatblog.wordpress.com/?p=29#comment-186</guid>
		<description>Perhaps I inferred that this site was supportive of pro-ana-mia by the general tone?  Thank you for clearing it up.

Your comment that my tone is conciliatory indicates that you are assuming I have some sort of ulterior motive other than what I plainly stated.  I am intensely interested in this topic and read with great interest the positions and points made in one direction or the other.

I have from time to time been known to go an a rant in defense of fat girls, but I think that some people are just totally closed off to the ideas.

From the approximately five posts I have read on this site and the material I read on myfatspouse.com I started to get the sense that this site and myfatspouse are in favor of whatever it takes to lose weight for your spouse.   Perhaps it&#039;s the anger in post after post and the constant snarky comments about the FA people and how ridiculous it is for them to feel this way or that way.

I think it&#039;s important to understand each others anger and pain.  To try and find that happy balance point.

I would never stop somebody from dieting if they felt like they&#039;d not been eating well.  I just get tired of the constant message that if you don&#039;t fall into that mainstream media idea of beauty that you are a worthless blob.

I posted my comment in terms of extremes - eating too much or starving, because that is what I see on this site:  extremes.

I feel that when weight begins to cause health problems and immobility that you probably should see a doctor and figure out what is wrong with your dietary habits and get some exercise.  We all should be exercising, it&#039;s good for us!  But if you are a size 22 woman and you change to healthier eating habits and exercise more and you only ever get down to a size 18, then you shouldn&#039;t have to feel ashamed or that you have somehow disrespected your spouse.  From what I can tell on this site size 16 or 18 are not considered acceptable.  That is the tone I was responding to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I inferred that this site was supportive of pro-ana-mia by the general tone?  Thank you for clearing it up.</p>
<p>Your comment that my tone is conciliatory indicates that you are assuming I have some sort of ulterior motive other than what I plainly stated.  I am intensely interested in this topic and read with great interest the positions and points made in one direction or the other.</p>
<p>I have from time to time been known to go an a rant in defense of fat girls, but I think that some people are just totally closed off to the ideas.</p>
<p>From the approximately five posts I have read on this site and the material I read on myfatspouse.com I started to get the sense that this site and myfatspouse are in favor of whatever it takes to lose weight for your spouse.   Perhaps it&#8217;s the anger in post after post and the constant snarky comments about the FA people and how ridiculous it is for them to feel this way or that way.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s important to understand each others anger and pain.  To try and find that happy balance point.</p>
<p>I would never stop somebody from dieting if they felt like they&#8217;d not been eating well.  I just get tired of the constant message that if you don&#8217;t fall into that mainstream media idea of beauty that you are a worthless blob.</p>
<p>I posted my comment in terms of extremes &#8211; eating too much or starving, because that is what I see on this site:  extremes.</p>
<p>I feel that when weight begins to cause health problems and immobility that you probably should see a doctor and figure out what is wrong with your dietary habits and get some exercise.  We all should be exercising, it&#8217;s good for us!  But if you are a size 22 woman and you change to healthier eating habits and exercise more and you only ever get down to a size 18, then you shouldn&#8217;t have to feel ashamed or that you have somehow disrespected your spouse.  From what I can tell on this site size 16 or 18 are not considered acceptable.  That is the tone I was responding to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: parallelsidewalk</title>
		<link>http://unfatblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/fat-acceptance-wants-internet-censorship/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>parallelsidewalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfatblog.wordpress.com/?p=29#comment-184</guid>
		<description>Nobody here is pro-ana. Period. There are a small handful of pro-ana sites but by and large it is a bogeyman created by FA to tar anybody who doesn&#039;t believe that morbid obesity is a healthy lifestyle. Nobody is advocating &quot;starving and obsessing and taking laxatives, vomiting etc&quot;. Fat acceptance is one extreme, pro-ana is another. A simple acceptance of healthy eating and exercise patterns is the  middle ground that FA can&#039;t accept and has to recast as its opposite. I appreciate the conciliatory tone but the truth is you&#039;re sort of using strawman arguments to make it sound as if someone has to either eat a ton of unhealthy shit or be &quot;starving herself, vomiting and taking laxatives&quot;. It&#039;s like saying someone who isn&#039;t freezing to death must be self-immolating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody here is pro-ana. Period. There are a small handful of pro-ana sites but by and large it is a bogeyman created by FA to tar anybody who doesn&#8217;t believe that morbid obesity is a healthy lifestyle. Nobody is advocating &#8220;starving and obsessing and taking laxatives, vomiting etc&#8221;. Fat acceptance is one extreme, pro-ana is another. A simple acceptance of healthy eating and exercise patterns is the  middle ground that FA can&#8217;t accept and has to recast as its opposite. I appreciate the conciliatory tone but the truth is you&#8217;re sort of using strawman arguments to make it sound as if someone has to either eat a ton of unhealthy shit or be &#8220;starving herself, vomiting and taking laxatives&#8221;. It&#8217;s like saying someone who isn&#8217;t freezing to death must be self-immolating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Bartlett</title>
		<link>http://unfatblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/fat-acceptance-wants-internet-censorship/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Bartlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfatblog.wordpress.com/?p=29#comment-178</guid>
		<description>I have had run ins with militant types before and in fact just blogged about the topic today.  

I think, as I happened to mention there, that the anger comes from pain.  The pain of being an outcast in a society that is just fine with you being an outcast.

Although I consider myself a fat feminist and a champion of good self esteem, it&#039;s important to keep communication lines open, not shut them down.  That doesn&#039;t help anybody.  It also isn&#039;t very persuasive because you&#039;re only preaching to the choir that way.

Pro ana-mia sites make me sad and scare me and I think they are wrong.  The disparity between your numbers in health related issues seems persuasive at first, but you are not taking a lot of things into account when you look at the simple death numbers.  

If the subject is health, neither eating large quantities of sugar-laden, fat-laden, trans-fat filled food is good nor is starving and obsessing and taking laxatives, vomiting etc.  

However, more and more studies are showing that you can be well above those ridiculous height-weight table guidelines and still be healthy.  In fact being fatter girl who feels good about herself and exercises is probably a lot healthier than a girl starving herself, vomiting and taking laxatives.

I wish we could all come together and lift each other up, rather than tear each other down.

Censorship is not the answer, but championing pro-ana-mia cause is no sword I&#039;d want to die on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had run ins with militant types before and in fact just blogged about the topic today.  </p>
<p>I think, as I happened to mention there, that the anger comes from pain.  The pain of being an outcast in a society that is just fine with you being an outcast.</p>
<p>Although I consider myself a fat feminist and a champion of good self esteem, it&#8217;s important to keep communication lines open, not shut them down.  That doesn&#8217;t help anybody.  It also isn&#8217;t very persuasive because you&#8217;re only preaching to the choir that way.</p>
<p>Pro ana-mia sites make me sad and scare me and I think they are wrong.  The disparity between your numbers in health related issues seems persuasive at first, but you are not taking a lot of things into account when you look at the simple death numbers.  </p>
<p>If the subject is health, neither eating large quantities of sugar-laden, fat-laden, trans-fat filled food is good nor is starving and obsessing and taking laxatives, vomiting etc.  </p>
<p>However, more and more studies are showing that you can be well above those ridiculous height-weight table guidelines and still be healthy.  In fact being fatter girl who feels good about herself and exercises is probably a lot healthier than a girl starving herself, vomiting and taking laxatives.</p>
<p>I wish we could all come together and lift each other up, rather than tear each other down.</p>
<p>Censorship is not the answer, but championing pro-ana-mia cause is no sword I&#8217;d want to die on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
